Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, Aloisi, Ford
Question: How does the evidence of new star
formation hundreds of light years from earth fit in with the young universe scenario
of biblical creation?
Recently,
an image from the Hubble telescope was presented to the public of—
“a dark cloud (Lupus 3) where new
stars are forming along with a cluster of brilliant stars that have already
emerged from their dusty stellar nursery …about 600 light-years from Earth”[i]
Astronomers
then presented as fact what is only theory, that these “new” stars were
actually born 600 light years ago because
it took that long for the light from their birth to travel across space to
earth where we could see it.
A literal
interpretation of creation in Genesis has all the stars of the universe brought
into existence and sent virtually instantaneously into their positions
in space relative to earth in the one twenty-four hour period of day four, thousands
(not billions) of years ago.
How then
can we see light that has travelled hundreds of light years from “newborn”
stars to earth if the universe is only thousands of years old? Visible starlight
is likely the “light trail” left behind as God flung the stars out from a
geographic center in space (i.e., “the
deep” — Gen. 1:1-2).
The very
concept of “new” star formation is based on the assumption that the universe is billions—not thousands—of years
old. That assumption is based upon another
assumption: that the speed of light is a universal constant—an unalterable
“law” of physics. Based upon those two
assumptions, the speed of light is used as a measuring stick to go backwards in time to determine how long
it took for starlight from individual stars and galaxies to come into existence
from the theorized Big Bang.
The Big
Bang itself is a theory based upon
the assumption that the universe is
billions of years old, which is built on the assumption that the speed of light as a universal constant. That is
the definition of circular reasoning, no matter how convincing the complicated
math required to calculate the age of stars.
So when we
read an article that states—
“…the faint irregular galaxy NGC
3738…about 12 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Ursa Major
(The Great Bear)…is undergoing a violent episode of star formation, converting
huge clouds of hydrogen gas — which glow red in the image — into new stars.”[ii]
—we need to
keep in mind that nobody is actually watching stars being formed. No one is
even watching the birth of stars 12 million light years ago. That is simply an
interpretation of data filtered through a whirlpool of circular assumptions.
In contrast
to complex, theoretical mathematics and computer algorithms based upon
un-provable assumptions, the Creator of the stars has told us how He did it, when He did it and why He
did it.
Ps.
33:6
By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, their starry
host by the breath of his mouth.
If God
chose to create stars in various stages of “maturity,” even as He created
mature seed-bearing trees, which then produced more seed-bearing trees (Gen.
1:11), it all points back to Him:
Ps. 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.
No comments:
Post a Comment