Biblegems #174
Question: Why do Mormons practice baptism for
the dead, and does the practice have any foundation in Scripture?
Much more
important than any current or past practice built upon this verse is what the
verse itself actually says and what
it actually means, as best as can be
determined from the evidence of the passage in its context.
1. 1Corinthians 15:29 is the only verse anywhere in the
entire Bible that refers to a ‘baptism for the dead.’ However, this verse does
not teach a baptism for the dead.
This is a narrative reference, not a tutorial statement or doctrinal statement.
What’s more, the apostle Paul uses this phrase in the form of a rhetorical
question. Doctrine cannot be legitimately based upon a question.
2. The context of the verse is all about the
resurrection of the dead. Specifically, Paul is refuting those who say there is
no resurrection of the dead by demonstrating how illogical such a belief is for
those who profess to be followers of Jesus Christ. He uses a series of “if” / “then”
arguments, such as ‘if there is no
resurrection then you are still dead
in your sins’ (17). He uses this same “if” / “then” argument in verse 29: “if there is no resurrection…” then “…what will those
do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are
people baptized for them?” The answer?
There would be no baptism for the dead if there is no resurrection.
What
does that imply for doctrine? Paul is simply making the logical point that if
there is no resurrection then the practice of baptism itself would be
meaningless.
3. A fundamental rule of
biblical interpretation is that ‘Scripture interprets Scripture.’ The Bible
consistently and exclusively teaches that a person is baptized as an outward
sign of repentance for his or her own sins. Nowhere does the Bible ever teach
any form of proxy baptism (i.e., being baptized on behalf of someone else), as
for example, taught by Mormonism.
Acts 2:38 Peter
replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ
for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy
Spirit.
4. Finally,
the phrase “baptized for the dead”
would be more accurately translated “baptized
with reference to [the resurrection] from the dead.” The word “for” in our English Bibles translates
the Greek word “huper.” Normally this
would be translated “for,” but it can also be translated “with reference to” when the context requires it, as is the case
here. Since Paul’s entire discussion in chapter 15 is focused on the resurrection of the dead, it is the
resurrection of the dead that he has in view in verse 29.
Conclusions
• Verse 29
does not teach baptism on behalf of those who have died.
• No
doctrine should ever be established on the weight of one Bible verse, all the more so a verse that is a question and that
teaches no doctrinal truth.
• The
context of the verse is about the resurrection, not about baptism for the dead.
• Proxy
baptism is contrary to the entire Biblical doctrine of baptism.
• The
wording in the Greek NT of the verse itself is consistent with the context of 1
Corinthians 15, and with the biblical teaching of baptism as a personal response
to God’s saving grace.
No comments:
Post a Comment