Showing posts with label New Jerusalem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Jerusalem. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

The Tree For Healing In Heaven

Biblegems #257





Question:  Why does Revelation 22:2 speak of a tree in heaven whose leaves bring healing to the nations if there is no more sickness in heaven?

Revelation 22:1-2  Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations.

John is allowed to see the creation of the New Heavens and the New Earth. The tree itself is located in the Holy City, the New Jerusalem, which has come “down out of heaven from God” to the New Earth (Rev. 21:1). In fact, God’s throne is located in the New Jerusalem, where He will dwell among His redeemed people on the New Earth:
         Rev. 21:1-4  Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,” for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away…. I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God… And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Look! God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. ‘He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death’ or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.”

Two words in Revelation 22:2 help make the verse a little clearer: “healing” and “nations.”

The word translated “healing” is therapeiav (pronounced ther-a-pay-an), from which we get the English word “therapy.” Literally, it means,to wait upon menially.”[i] It is sometimes used figuratively to express “serving” God in adoration and worship. It can also be used in the very specific sense of providing a “cure” for a disease.

In the context of the New Heavens and New Earth, healing of disease is no longer a concern (Rev. 21:4). Instead, the fruit of this tree “serves” as a constant supply of life-giving nutrition. This is exactly what was revealed to the prophet Ezekiel:
Ezek. 47:12  “And on the banks, on both sides of the river, there will grow all kinds of trees for food. Their leaves will not wither, nor their fruit fail, but they will bear fresh fruit every month, because the water for them flows from the sanctuary. Their fruit will be for food, and their leaves for healing.”

Both John and Ezekiel were given a glimpse into the eternal life we will enjoy in heaven where, in our resurrected bodies, we will enjoy the paradise of the New Earth. The “tree of life” in John’s vision is a singular, all-inclusive term for the “trees” of Ezekiel’s vision.

Finally, the word “nations” translates the Greek word ethne, meaning ethnic groups. All the peoples of the earth will be represented in the New Heavens and New Earth, enjoying the fruit of the tree of life:
         Rev. 5:9  And they sang a new song, saying: “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.





[i] Strong’s Greek Dictionary.

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

No Marriage In Heaven

Biblegems #186
Question: I've always been struck by the "nor given in marriage" verse. What if someone dies young? God has made it clear that we won't be let down in heaven. But is missing out on the beauty of a spousal relationship part of that? I guess the only solution to that quandary is to marry before you die?

Jesus made it clear that, as far as the resurrected redeemed are concerned, the act of getting married is reserved for “this age” only.
Luke 20:34 Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 But those who are considered worthy of taking part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, 36 and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection (cf. Matt. 22:30; Mk. 12:25).

This does mean that for those who die in Christ without having married will not be getting married in the resurrection. However, it should not be thought that they will in any way be less satisfied, less fulfilled, or experience any degree of loneliness. Even in this life, as Paul notes in 1 Corinthians 7, a healthy, godly marriage inevitably demands a dividing of interests:
         1Cor. 7:32-34  I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife—and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband.

This does not depreciate the beauty of marriage. But it does point out just how completely devoted we will be to Jesus in the resurrection. He will be our love and our life in a way that no other relationship can match. For those who are unmarried in the resurrection, their lives will be overflowing with the indescribable joy of eternal union with Jesus. When John saw the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven, it was far more than a walled city he beheld. He saw the people of God. The resurrected redeemed are the New Jerusalem! He saw what he could only describe in human terms as a bride:
         Rev. 21:2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.

This is more than a figure of speech; this is intimacy at a level far beyond that enjoyed by an earthly husband and wife. Indeed, married life now is…

         Eph. 5:32a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

The Bride Of Christ & The New Jerusalem

Biblegems #46
Are the Bride of Christ and the New Jerusalem the same?

The question arises from the following two passages in Revelation:
Rev. 3:12 Him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will he leave it. I will write on him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on him my new name.

Rev. 21:2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.

The word “city” often elicits images of crowded streets and clustered buildings, as when we hear the word “church” and picture buildings with sanctuaries and steeples. But in both cases, the principle idea behind the terms is the people within, rather than the structures that accommodate the people. After all, what would a city or a church be without people?

That being said, the Greek word used here for “city” is “polis,” which pictures a clearly defined town or city with walls. The New Jerusalem is presented in both the Old and New Testaments as city in terms of a physical location and as the people who populate it.

The New Jerusalem is not the same as the Jerusalem from which Jesus will reign on the earth during the Millennium. The Millennial Jerusalem will be built from earth’s resources brought in by the nations surviving Armageddon and the Lord’s return:
Is. 45:14 This is what the LORD says: “The products of Egypt and the merchandise of Cush, and those tall Sabeans—they will come over to you and will be yours; they will trudge behind you, coming over to you in chains. They will bow down before you and plead with you, saying, ‘Surely God is with you, and there is no other; there is no other god.’”
And…
Is. 54:11 O afflicted city, lashed by storms and not comforted, I will build you with stones of turquoise, your foundations with sapphires.

The New Jerusalem, however, is described as coming down from God through the new heavens to the new earth (21:1), all of which follows the Millennial Reign of Christ, the defeat of Satan and the Great White Throne Judgment.

This is the city Abraham anticipated:
For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God (Heb. 11:10).
This city is a “polis,” a physical location perfectly suited for the resurrected people of God:
…Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them (Heb. 11:16).

But the New Jerusalem is also the people who inhabit the city, the Bride of Christ:
But you have come to Mount Zion, to the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly, to the church of the firstborn, whose names are written in heaven (Heb. 12:22-23).

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Where Is the Ark of the Covenant?

Biblegems #16
Here’s a great, two-fold question from a young man concerning the Ark of the Covenant: 1) What happened to the Ark, and (2) will it be ever be found again?

Here’s what we know for certain: The Ark of the Covenant, which had accompanied the Hebrews during their 40 year wandering in the wilderness, and was then situated at a variety of locations in conquered Canaan for several hundred years, was finally brought to Jerusalem by King David. His son Solomon built the First Temple and brought the Ark into the Holy of Holies (1 Sam. 5-6). It remained there until the Temple was destroyed by the Babylonian Empire in 586 B.C.

There are many theories as to what happened to the Ark. Some contend that it exists still in a cave within the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Others believe it survives in Africa or Egypt. But there is no real definitive proof as to its survival or possible whereabouts.

The apocryphal book of Maccabees, which relates the historical uprising of the Jews in Israel against the Seleucid Empire and the establishment of the Jewish Hasmonean Empire from 164 – 63 B.C., refers to the disappearance of the Ark. It states that the prophet Jeremiah hid the Ark in a cave on “the mountain where Moses had gone up and had seen the inheritance of God” (2 Macc. 2:4 RSV). The location was supposedly lost soon after, and Jeremiah is claimed to have prophesied that it would remain lost “until God gathers his people together again” in the days of the Messiah (2 Macc. 2:7-8 RSV).

The problem with this side-note in 2 Maccabees is that there is no record of such a prophecy in the book of Jeremiah itself. Indeed, Jeremiah prophesied that when the Messiah reigns on earth from Mt Zion, the Ark will not be recovered and “it will never enter their minds or be remembered; it will not be missed, nor will another one be made” (Jer. 3:16).

Most likely, from the limited information available, 1) the Ark was destroyed in 586 B.C. by the Babylonians (their record of the Temple artifacts brought back to Babylon does not include the Ark), or (2) The Ark was buried beneath the Temple just before the Temple was destroyed.

Jeremiah’s prophecy should remind us that the Ark ‘s purpose was fulfilled in the Old Testament, and its foreshadowing of the cross of Christ fulfilled in the New Testament. Other than satisfying a certain archeological curiosity, its recovery would serve no further spiritual value. And, when Jesus returns to establish His Kingdom, the Ark—if it were found—would seem as nothing more than a gold-covered box in comparison with the beauty, power, majesty and of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords!
Sources: T he Jewish Virtual Library is a division of the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise; LIVIUS , Articles on Ancient History (online); 2 Maccabees, RSV; The Bible (NIV),